| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1995:J002294.19950619 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 19 June 1995 | ||||||||
| Case number: | J 0022/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | - | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B02B 1/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Reduction of phytale in oats | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | - | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Restitutio - no Two months time limit - removal of cause of non-compliance Address for correspondence Appointment of representative - no retrospective effect Principle of protection of legitmate expectation - no warning for any deficiency |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
I. An appointment of a representative has no retrospective effect on notifications made before. II. A party may only expect a warning in respect of a deficiency if there was a specific indication for the EPO that there could be a misunderstanding in respect of the requirements to be fulfilled. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j940022eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021