Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0017/12 () of 8.7.2013

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2013:R001712.20130708

Date of decision:

08 July 2013

Case number:

R 0017/12

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

H04Q 7/32
H04B 1/38

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 138Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Improved GSM cellular terminal

Applicant name:

S.I.SV.EL. Societa Italiana per lo Sviluppo dell'Elettronica S.p.A.

Opponent name:

NÃ¤gerl, JoÃ«l

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)

Keywords:

Petition for review - not clearly inadmissible - clearly unallowable
Violation of right to be heard

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0002/08
R 0012/09
R 0015/10

Citing decisions:

R 0001/17
T 1635/13

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r120017eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

11 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.109 EPC Procedure in dealing with petitions for review

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 4.3.7 Parties' obligation to participate actively in the appeal proceedings

X CLR V B 4.3.8.C Subjective surprise

General Case Law

X R 0002/08 (Violation fondamentale de l'article 113/VSL International) of 11.9.2008

X R 0012/09 () of 15.1.2010

X R 0015/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/SEIKO) of 25.11.2010

X R 0001/17 (ÃberprÃ¼fungsantrag/IFM ELECTRONIC) of 10.7.2018

X T 1635/13 () of 21.6.2017