R 0009/14 (Fundamental violation of Art. 13(1) EPC) of 24.2.2015

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2015:R000914.20150224
Date of decision: 24 February 2015
Case number: R 0009/14
Petition for review of: T 2044/09
Application number: 00929313.5
IPC class: C12M 1/36
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 113 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: U-shape and/or nozzle-U-loop fermentor and methods or carrying out a fermentation process
Applicant name: Larsen, Ebbe Busch
Opponent name: NORFERM AS
Board: EBA
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 4(3)
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(4)
European Patent Convention Art 113(1)
European Patent Convention R 104
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 126(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 20(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 20(2)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6
Keywords: Obligation of the Board to give hints regarding the relevant issues in an inter partes case - no
Petition for review clearly not allowable
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
R 0001/08
R 0002/08
R 0011/08
R 0004/09
R 0009/09
R 0013/09
R 0017/09
R 0018/09
R 0021/09
R 0004/11
Citing decisions:
R 0013/14
R 0008/15
T 0318/11
T 2215/14
T 0997/15
T 1787/16
T 1861/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r140009eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

30 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law