Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0003/18 () of 12.11.2018

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2018:R000318.20181112

Date of decision:

12 November 2018

Case number:

R 0003/18

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

A01N 55/08
B27K 3/36

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 40Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

WOOD TREATMENT

Applicant name:

Harrower, Norma Ellen Lilette

Opponent name:

-

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(4)
European Patent Convention R 107(2)
European Patent Convention R 108(1)

Keywords:

Reliance on, and substantiation of, any fundamental procedural defect: no
Petition for review clearly inadmissible

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0010/09
R 0010/14
R 0008/15

Citing decisions:

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r180003eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

10 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112 EPC Decision or opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.107 EPC Contents of the petition for review

X R.108 EPC Examination of the petition

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

X CLR V B 3.7.1 Petition must be adequately substantiated

General Case Law

X R 0010/09 () of 22.6.2010

X R 0010/14 (Antrag auf ÃberprÃ¼fung) of 29.5.2015

X R 0008/15 (Fundamental violation of the right to be heard) of 18.7.2016

X T 0578/14 () of 25.4.2017