| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T004800.20020612 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 12 June 2002 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0048/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91310627.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A23G 1/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the production of chocolate | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | CERESTAR HOLDING BV | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | ROQUETTE FRERES, S.A. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Substantial procedural violation - yes - inadmissibility of late filed request in oral proceedings at the opposition stage immediately followed by revocation of the patent - unsatisfactory wording before final decision - meaning of of main request Remittal to first instance - (yes) Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) - not equitable in the circumstances of the case Apportionment of costs - more appropriate for decision in resumed first instance proceedings |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000048eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021