| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2004:T056902.20040602 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 02 June 2004 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0569/02 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 90108486.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B24D 11/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Coated abrasive material and method of making same | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | SGA, Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.07 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Insufficiency - no Novelty - yes Inventive step - yes Late filed comparative tests - not admitted |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Comparative tests filed one month before the oral proceedings were found inadmissible regardless of their possible relevance (point 5). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t020569eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021