| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T068905.20100907 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 07 September 2010 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0689/05 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 96938526.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G11B 27/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Multi-language recording medium and reproducing device for the same | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Remittal to first instance - no - partial lack of reasoning does not amount to a fundamental deficiency and summons to oral proceedings in The Hague does not violate Article 113(1)EPC Inventive step (main and first auxiliary request - no) Sufficiency of disclosure (second auxiliary request - yes - claimed recording medium not a DVD as defined in the DVD standard) Priority (not valid for the second auxiliary request) Novelty (second auxiliary request - no) Request for reimbursement of appeal fee (refused) Request for reimbursement of travel cost for the representative to oral proceedings held in the Hague (refused) - no competence of the board to decide on such a request |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t050689eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021