Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0261/07 (Culture medium/WELLCOME) of 27.9.2007

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T026107.20070927

Date of decision:

27 September 2007

Case number:

T 0261/07

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 49Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Culture medium for CHO-cells and adapted CHO-cells

Applicant name:

THE WELLCOME FOUNDATION LIMITED

Opponent name:

Amgen Inc.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Dr. AndrÃ© Kasche

Board:

3.3.08

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention 1973 Art 108
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 122
European Patent Convention 1973 R 78

Keywords:

Delivery to addressee (yes)
Appeal deemed not to have been filed
Referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)
Restitutio in integrum (no)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (yes)

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

J 0016/82
J 0012/84
J 0002/86
J 0009/86
J 0017/89
J 0022/92
J 0035/97
T 0013/82
T 0191/82
T 0130/83
T 0030/90
T 0324/90
T 0381/93
T 0949/94
T 0686/97
T 0247/98
T 0283/01
T 0172/04
T 0743/05

Citing decisions:

J 0009/16
T 0257/07
T 1962/08
T 1535/10
T 0742/11

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t070261eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

30 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III E 4.1.1.A Removal of the cause of non-compliance

X CLR III E 4.4 Substantiation of the request for re-establishment

X CLR III E 5.1 Submissions to be taken into account

X CLR III E 5.4.4.A Cross-check should be independent in a large firm

X CLR III S 2 Notification to representatives

X CLR III S 3 Notification to third parties

General Case Law

X J 0016/82 (Assistant; substitute) of 2.3.1983

X J 0012/84 (Restitutio in integrum) of 25.1.1985

X J 0002/86 (Isolated mistake - restitutio) of 21.10.1986

X J 0009/86 (Restitutio) of 17.3.1987

X J 0017/89 () of 9.1.1990

X J 0022/92 (Re-establishment of rights) of 15.12.1994

X J 0035/97 (Zweitakt/HONES) of 7.6.2000

X J 0009/16 () of 21.11.2016

X T 0013/82 (Statement of Grounds of appeal) of 3.3.1983

X T 0191/82 (Re-establishment of rights) of 16.4.1985

X T 0130/83 () of 8.5.1984

X T 0030/90 () of 13.6.1991

X T 0324/90 (Re-establishment) of 13.3.1991

X T 0381/93 (Re-establishment/RCA Thomson) of 12.8.1994

X T 0949/94 () of 24.3.1995

X T 0686/97 () of 12.5.1998

X T 0247/98 (Zustellungsfiktion/CLARIANT) of 17.6.1999

X T 0283/01 (Re-establishment/HERAEUS) of 3.9.2002

X T 0172/04 (Enhancement of roller blinds/L'ESTOR S.L.) of 13.12.2005

X T 0743/05 () of 12.10.2006

X T 0257/07 (Restitutio/PHILIPS) of 13.3.2008

X T 1962/08 () of 12.12.2010

X T 1535/10 (ZulÃ¤ssigkeit der Beschwerde) of 13.5.2011

X T 0742/11 (Due care/CHEQUEPOINT FRANCHISE CORP.) of 29.3.2012