| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T252611.20130109 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 January 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2526/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 03779813.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09D 183/04 C09D 183/08 C09D 4/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process and composition for coating | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Nanogate AG | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Evonik Degussa GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Right to be heard (yes) - Discretion of the opposition division not to postpone the oral proceedings - Right principles applied Admissibility of the amendment (no) - Reformulation of the wording of claim 1 - not occasioned by a ground of opposition Late-filed requests (not admitted) - Could have been filed earlier - contravene the need for procedural economy |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t112526eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
