| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T008192.19930705 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 05 July 1993 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0081/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 81302149.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H01H 33/66 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Vacuum-housed circuit interrupter | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Kabushiki Kaisha Meidensha | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin & München | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Appellant adversely affected by decision under appeal (yes) Inventive step (yes) Could or would Apportionment of costs ordered by Opposition Division set aside Parties to appeal - entitlement to appeal - adversely affected (yes) inventive step (yes) Costs - apportionment - taking evidence (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t920081eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
