| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1998:T092194.19981030 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 30 October 1998 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0921/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91810463.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09B 1/20 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the preparation of aminoanthraquinone derivatives | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step (yes, after amendment) - problem and solution approach - non-obvious alternative process Procedural violation (yes) - refusal after one communication - legal obligation to issue a further communication under Article 96(2) EPC - obligation to deal with applicant's submissions in substance Reimbursement of the appeal fee (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
If an applicant provides bona fide submissions and/or technical information in reply to a communication of the Examining Division substantially changing the points at issue, the Examining Division has a legal obligation under Article 96(2) EPC to inform the applicant of the objections under the EPC arising from the new situation and to invite him to provide further observations before issuing a decision to refuse the application (see point 6.2.2 of the decision). A failure to do so amounts to a procedural violation. A decision, which only comprises a mere formal acknowledgement of the applicant's submissions, without dealing with them in substance, contravenes the general principle of good faith and fair proceedings that reasoned decisions contain at least some reasoning on the crucial points of dispute in order to give the party concerned a fair idea of why his submissions were not considered convincing, and consequently also contravenes Rule 68(2) EPC amounting to a substantial procedural violation too (see point 6.2.3 of the decision). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t940921eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021