Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0003/12 () of 29.8.2012

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R000312.20120829

Date of decision:

29 August 2012

Case number:

R 0003/12

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

A61K 31/4355
A61P 35/00

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 109Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Use of cyclopamine in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma and other tumors

Applicant name:

Tas, Sinan

Opponent name:

Curis, Inc.

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 21(4)(a)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(4)
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 104
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 107(2)
European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13

Keywords:

Submissions with respect to Art. 113 EPC not substantiated
Petition for review clearly inadmissible

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0010/09
R 0016/09

Citing decisions:

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r120003eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

11 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.21 EPC Boards of Appeal

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.107 EPC Contents of the petition for review

X R.109 EPC Procedure in dealing with petitions for review

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.2 Grounds listed exhaustively

X CLR V B 4.3.12 No right to be heard separately on all requests

General Case Law

X R 0010/09 () of 22.6.2010

X R 0016/09 () of 19.5.2010