| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T058508.20091020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 20 October 2009 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0585/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 03700147.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H04N 13/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Apparatus for stereoscopic photography | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Perisic, Zoran | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Date of removal of cause of non-compliance determined (yes) Reasoned request for re-establishment of rights in due time (no) Duty of the EPO to warn appellant about deficiency (no) Power of the board to examine appeal on its merits (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The principle of good faith does not impose any obligation on the EPO to scrutinize documents on file to establish whether grounds and facts with respect to a request for re-establishment of rights are missing (points 13-19 of the Reasons). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t080585eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021