| European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T259812.20170804 |
| Date of decision: |
04 August 2017 |
| Case number: |
T 2598/12 |
| Application number: |
06026336.5 |
| IPC class: |
G05B 19/05 |
| Language of proceedings: |
EN |
| Distribution: |
C |
| Download and more information: |
|
| Title of application: |
Remote monitoring and control of an I/O module |
| Applicant name: |
Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. |
| Opponent name: |
- |
| Board: |
3.5.03 |
| Headnote: |
- |
| Relevant legal provisions: |
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) |
|
| Keywords: |
Admissibility of late-filed request (no) |
| Catchwords: |
There is no time bar to the requirement following from Article 12(2) and (4) RPBA that a request filed during appeal proceedings must be properly substantiated (cf. point 1.8 of the reasons). Consequently, this requirement applies, mutatis mutandis, to new requests filed in response to a communication of the board.
|
| Cited decisions: |
|
| Citing decisions: |
|
7 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
Offical Journal of the EPO
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law Book: V Priority
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law of the Enlarged Board
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...