| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T014985.19860114 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 14 January 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0149/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 81200729.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C04B 33/16 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Bredero | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | It is inadmissible for a German opponent to file an opposition in the Dutch language even if represented by a Dutch patent attorney. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inadmissible language of opposition | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t850149ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
6 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
