| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T000289.19890703 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 03 July 1989 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0002/89 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 82101469.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09D 5/44 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | BASF | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Herberts GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | 1. The facts presented in support of grounds for an opposition must be sufficient for the EPO and the patent proprietor to understand the case without further investigation (confirmation of T 222/85, "Inadmissibility /PPG", OJ EPO 1988, 128). 2. An opposition complies with Rule 55(c) EPC even if it does not relate to all the features of the contested claim. |
||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of opposition Opposition - admissibility Sufficient grounds for opposition |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890002ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
25 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
