Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0976/97 () of 16.8.2000

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T097697.20000816

Datum der Entscheidung:

16 August 2000

Aktenzeichen:

T 0976/97

Anmeldenummer:

IPC-Klasse:

Verfahrenssprache:

DE

Verteilung:

C

Download und weitere Informationen:

Text der Entscheidung in DE (PDF, 1Â MB)
Alle Dokumente zum Beschwerdeverfahren finden Sie im Register
Bibliografische Daten verfügbar in:	DE
Fassungen:	Unpublished

Bezeichnung der Anmeldung:

Verfahren zur Herstellung von Schaumstoffen

Name des Anmelders:

SOLVAY (SociÃ©tÃ© Anonyme)

Name des Einsprechenden:

-

Kammer:

3.3.03

Leitsatz:

-

Relevante Rechtsnormen:

European Patent Convention 1973 Art 58
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 60
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 96(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 97(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 20
European Patent Convention 1973 R 51(4)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 51(6)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
European Patent Convention 1973 R 86(3)

Schlagwörter:

Berechtigter Inhaber
Rechtliches GehÃ¶r - vom Patentanmelder gebilligte Fassung
Wesentlicher Verfahrensfehler (verneint)

Orientierungssatz:

-

Angeführte Entscheidungen:

G 0003/89
G 0010/92
G 0007/93
G 0010/93
J 0013/94
J 0027/94
J 0026/95
J 0029/95
T 0549/96

Anführungen in anderen Entscheidungen:

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t970976du1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

13 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III I 7 Interlocutory decision on allowable auxiliary request – distinction between examination proceedings and opposition proceedings

X CLR III B 3.3 The requirement of a text agreed by the applicant

X CLR III M 2.3 Transfer

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0003/89 (Correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC) of 19.11.1992

X G 0010/92 (Divisional application) of 28.4.1994

X G 0007/93 (Late amendments) of 13.5.1994

X G 0010/93 (Scope of examination in ex parte appeal) of 30.11.1994

General Case Law

X J 0013/94 (Divisional application) of 4.10.1996

X J 0027/94 (Divisional application) of 27.2.1995

X J 0026/95 (Bankruptcy) of 13.10.1998

X J 0029/95 (Divisional application) of 30.1.1996

X T 0549/96 (Vitamin D derivatives/BONE CARE) of 9.3.1999

X T 0482/06 () of 18.5.2006