| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:W003292.19921015 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 15 October 1992 | ||||||||
| Case number: | W 0032/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | - | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61B 17/32 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | WISAP | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | There is lack of unity within the meaning of Article 17(3)(a) and Rule 13 PCT if the subject-matters of independent claims including their effects have no inventive common feature in those parts of the claims differing from the closest prior art (following W 6/90, OJ EPO 1991, 438). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Lack of unity a posteriori (yes) | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/w920032ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
9 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.PCT Articles
PCT Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)