J 0003/87 (Membranes) of 2.12.1987

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1987:J000387.19871202
Date of decision: 02 December 1987
Case number: J 0003/87
Application number: 84903426.9
IPC class: B01D 13/04
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 537 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Memtec
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.1.01
Headnote: 1. The principles of good faith governing relations between the EPO and applicants require communications to be clear and unambiguous to the applicant (cf. decision J 2/87 of 20 July 1987, OJ EPO 1988,330). Communications must be worded so as to rule out any misunderstanding on the part of a reasonable addressee.
2. A party to proceedings before the EPO cannot suffer a disadvantage as a result of having been misled by a communication which could fairly be regarded as misleading to a reasonable addressee.
3. An examination fee surcharge which would not have become due in the absence of a misleading communication must accordingly be reimbursed in accordance with the principles of good faith.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 R 101(4)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 85b
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
Keywords: Reimbursement of surcharge on examination fee (yes)
Filing of authorisation in due time
Clarity and unambiguity of communications
Principles of good faith
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
G 0002/97
J 0027/92
J 0043/92
J 0013/93
J 0014/94
J 0029/94
J 0030/94
J 0018/96
J 0001/97
J 0038/97
J 0034/03
J 0003/05
J 0005/07
J 0010/07
J 0001/12
J 0013/16
J 0010/17
J 0001/19
T 0522/88
T 0831/90
T 0516/91
T 0601/91
T 0690/93
T 0181/95
T 0272/95
T 0343/95
T 0460/95
T 0493/95
T 0188/97
T 0815/02
T 1181/04
T 0308/05
T 2092/13
T 0578/14

33 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law